You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions, articles and access our other FREE features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, download files, upload your own photos and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today!
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact contact us.
The California Supreme Court has approved to proceed with a lawsuit challenging the terms of carrier contracts, specifically locked handsets and ETF’s, T-Mobile being the first to play defendant. Previously, carriers have tried to dis miss the case on the grounds that its contract requires customers to dispute complaints through arbitration. But the plaintiffs legal time has argued that the claims being made against T-Mobile can not be satisfied through arbitration. Time will tell how this story unfolds.
The California Supreme Court has approved to proceed with a lawsuit challenging the terms of carrier contracts, specifically locked handsets and ETF’s, T-Mobile being the first to play defendant. Previously, carriers have tried to dis miss the case on the grounds that its contract requires customers to dispute complaints through arbitration. But the plaintiffs legal time has argued that the claims being made against T-Mobile can not be satisfied through arbitration. Time will tell how this story unfolds.
Linear Mode
